• 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • درباره ما
  • درخواست موردی
  • فهرست استانداردها
    • Industrial Standards
    • Defence Standards
  • راهنما
  • Login
  • لیست خرید شما 0
    • ارسال درخواست
    • حذف همه
View Item 
  •   YSE
  • Industrial Standards
  • ASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
  • View Item
  •   YSE
  • Industrial Standards
  • ASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
  • View Item
  • All Fields
  • Title(or Doc Num)
  • Organization
  • Year
  • Subject
Advanced Search
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Archive

ASHRAE AB-10-012

A Comparative Analysis and Validation of Two DX Cooling Coil Modeling Methods

Organization:
ASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
Year: 2010

Abstract: INTRODUCTION
The DX air cooling coil model is a key module in modeling or simulating an overall cooling system to facilitate the system's design, operation, and maintenance. Generally, all engineering simulation or modeling programs include an element modeling module for DX cooling coils, but individual programs may use different modeling methods and thus have different performance. For example, EnergyPlus is one of the most popular building energy simulation tools which was originally based on Blast and DOE-2 and has been improved during one decade. However, although it is often used as a benchmark for comparative analysis, its performance is still very sensitive to user inputs. For example, the selection of the rated air flow rate has a significant impact on the DX coil sensible cooling capacity. Within the wide range of rated air flow rate suggested by EnergyPlus, an individual user may select a different rated air flow rate so that the predication could be very different (Hand et. al, 2005). Recently, Yang and Li (2009) developed a GRDB DX coils modeling method. This method was validated by extensive laboratory testing and demonstrated to have good accuracy and to be easy to use. The objective of this paper is to perform an extensive comparative analysis between this GRDB DX cooling coil modeling method and the DX cooling coil modeling method used in EnergyPlus.
URI: http://mapnamagz.yabesh.ir/std;query=autho4A5893/handle/yse/208760
Collections :
  • ASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
  • Download PDF : (2.261Mb)
  • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
  • Statistics

    ASHRAE AB-10-012

Show full item record

contributor authorASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
date accessioned2017-09-04T18:26:32Z
date available2017-09-04T18:26:32Z
date copyright01/01/2010
date issued2010
identifier otherILVKAEAAAAAAAAAA.pdf
identifier urihttp://mapnamagz.yabesh.ir/std;query=autho4A5893/handle/yse/208760
description abstractINTRODUCTION
The DX air cooling coil model is a key module in modeling or simulating an overall cooling system to facilitate the system's design, operation, and maintenance. Generally, all engineering simulation or modeling programs include an element modeling module for DX cooling coils, but individual programs may use different modeling methods and thus have different performance. For example, EnergyPlus is one of the most popular building energy simulation tools which was originally based on Blast and DOE-2 and has been improved during one decade. However, although it is often used as a benchmark for comparative analysis, its performance is still very sensitive to user inputs. For example, the selection of the rated air flow rate has a significant impact on the DX coil sensible cooling capacity. Within the wide range of rated air flow rate suggested by EnergyPlus, an individual user may select a different rated air flow rate so that the predication could be very different (Hand et. al, 2005). Recently, Yang and Li (2009) developed a GRDB DX coils modeling method. This method was validated by extensive laboratory testing and demonstrated to have good accuracy and to be easy to use. The objective of this paper is to perform an extensive comparative analysis between this GRDB DX cooling coil modeling method and the DX cooling coil modeling method used in EnergyPlus.
languageEnglish
titleASHRAE AB-10-012num
titleA Comparative Analysis and Validation of Two DX Cooling Coil Modeling Methodsen
typestandard
page16
statusActive
treeASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.:;2010
contenttypefulltext
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian
 
DSpace software copyright © 2017-2020  DuraSpace
نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
yabeshDSpacePersian