درباره ما
NATO AJP-6
ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Organization:
NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Year: 2011
Abstract: Introduction
a. If properly used and protected, modern network-enabled CIS offer the JFC a potentially significant advantage over an adversary.
b. Secure communications and data transfer capabilities should be incorporated wherever military operations are planned or executed. CIS services and support, including automated decision aids, assist in the planning, execution, and monitoring of operations.
c. Operations should be characterized normally by centralized direction to achieve unity of effort, whereas authority for execution should be decentralized, i.e., delegated to the lowest level appropriate for the most effective use of forces. To enable the execution of such direction, a joint C2 structure is required that must be fully understood at all levels, and thus facilitate the clear, timely, and secure passage of guidance/orders, situation reports, and coordinating information. Because of the joint nature of the force, the characteristics, doctrine, procedures, and equipment of each of the components must be considered.
a. If properly used and protected, modern network-enabled CIS offer the JFC a potentially significant advantage over an adversary.
b. Secure communications and data transfer capabilities should be incorporated wherever military operations are planned or executed. CIS services and support, including automated decision aids, assist in the planning, execution, and monitoring of operations.
c. Operations should be characterized normally by centralized direction to achieve unity of effort, whereas authority for execution should be decentralized, i.e., delegated to the lowest level appropriate for the most effective use of forces. To enable the execution of such direction, a joint C2 structure is required that must be fully understood at all levels, and thus facilitate the clear, timely, and secure passage of guidance/orders, situation reports, and coordinating information. Because of the joint nature of the force, the characteristics, doctrine, procedures, and equipment of each of the components must be considered.
Collections
:
Show full item record
| contributor author | NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization | |
| date accessioned | 2017-09-04T17:19:59Z | |
| date available | 2017-09-04T17:19:59Z | |
| date copyright | 04/06/2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier other | ZOYAJEAAAAAAAAAA.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://mapnamagz.yabesh.ir/std;query=autho1826AF67FCdardstandardsfen/handle/yse/143215 | |
| description abstract | Introduction a. If properly used and protected, modern network-enabled CIS offer the JFC a potentially significant advantage over an adversary. b. Secure communications and data transfer capabilities should be incorporated wherever military operations are planned or executed. CIS services and support, including automated decision aids, assist in the planning, execution, and monitoring of operations. c. Operations should be characterized normally by centralized direction to achieve unity of effort, whereas authority for execution should be decentralized, i.e., delegated to the lowest level appropriate for the most effective use of forces. To enable the execution of such direction, a joint C2 structure is required that must be fully understood at all levels, and thus facilitate the clear, timely, and secure passage of guidance/orders, situation reports, and coordinating information. Because of the joint nature of the force, the characteristics, doctrine, procedures, and equipment of each of the components must be considered. | |
| language | English | |
| title | NATO AJP-6 | num |
| title | ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS | en |
| type | standard | |
| page | 76 | |
| status | Active | |
| tree | NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization:;2011 | |
| contenttype | fulltext |